In connection with my photography work, I’ve happened across an increasing number of discussions about the need for metrics to impose more of a “truth in advertising” for images of people that have been re-touched.

My wife often refers to a true story from a women in one of my divorce support groups. The woman’s husband complained that she didn’t “look like Pamela Anderson.”

To which my wife says: “No woman does. Not even Pamela Anderson.” Such is our post-Photoshop world.

Scripture is replete with prohibitions instructing husbands not to look elsewhere, of course.

Exodus 20:17 includes words about not coveting “your neighbor’s wife.” Jesus equates look with deed in Matthew 5:28.

But such cautions mean more than simply a laundry list of thou shalt nots. Here, as always, I note and marvel at the reality of God’s love as expressed through His direction in The Bible. The Ten Commandments aren’t there to spoil our fun; they were carved in stone to protect us.

Here’s another example of how science backs that up.

Last summer, Psychology Today ran a feature titled, “Porn-Induced Sexual Dysfunction Is a Growing Problem,” by Marnia Robinson. Pornography first victimizes the one who gazes upon it.

Ms Robinson begins with the fact that pornography has been around for a long time. And it’s that very fact that makes it easy to miss as potential causation in other personal and societal dysfunctions. Based on my wife’s Pamela Anderson comment, I’d say divorce. Certainly undermining relationships through the notion that what one has isn’t as good as it could be, based on what appears to be available elsewhere. Marnia Robinson says it hurts the person, as an individual.

Why?

Because it is both easier to “create” perfect images, and those perfect images are increasingly ubiquitous. Barriers to consumption have been lowered to effective non-existence. Authorities and role models aren’t there to even suggest pornography should be avoided. Nor that there are, like in almost everything we do, any consequences whatsoever.

To wit:

… a never-ending stream of Read the rest of this entry »

Stumbled across this title earlier today, and I have to admit to being intrigued.

“Marriage is not the root of all divorce,” it reads.

Indeed.

Author Brande Victorian begins her article with some pop-culture cites from Hollywood icons. More people are declining to marry due because more people are deciding to divorce, goes the thinking.

But raw divorce statistics tell us almost nothing about our individual circumstances, give us little understanding or direction.

Marriage isn’t an across the board type of thing, it’s a union between two people, and what doesn’t work between one couple has no bearing on what will work with another.

That’s absolutely correct.

Ms Victorian goes on, then, to try and get at what that really means. And that’s where she stumbles.

Her premise seems to be that marriage is merely an evolutionary step, like an ice cube that fluidly melts into water. Not anything more than what was; but somehow different.

Curiously, she offhandedly dismisses the value of any “declaration before God,” or, for that matter, expression of commitment given in the presence of family or friends. How is it, then, that “society” is recognized as having the power to undermine marriage, but not encourage it?

In my own practices, it’s quite common to find at root in failing and failed marriages the divisive counsel of “friends” (in whom such trust has clearly been misplaced). An ignorance regarding God’s power, the value of His communities, and the inherent unity that can come to a marriage where the partners share their common faith in Him.

Brande Victorian seems to come round to an appreciation of this as she works through her writing.

A marriage is an individual union between two people and if they set realistic expectations that each partner is willing to commit to for life then they have a Read the rest of this entry »

There’s an old joke about a married couple that decides to “compromise” on their differing desires for ideal vacation venue.

Husband wants The Magic Kingdom in Florida. Wife wants Disneyland in California.

So they agree to compromise — splitting the difference. They end up in the Oklahoma Panhandle for two weeks.

Earlier this year, I wrote in another context about this almost holy grail of divorce mediation tactics, too frequently imposed upon spouses. “Everyone’s gotta give a little,” goes the bromide. Sold on the unsubstantiated assumption that “we all want the same thing.”

Now it’s almost become cliché to cite 1 Kings 3:16-27 where Solomon tests two women arguing for custody of the same baby. He says he’ll split the little bundle of joy in two, giving each a roughly equal half. The Solomon ploy uniquely worked because:

  • There was an actual truth to be found;
  • The alternative to not surrendering was death; and,
  • One of the parties was undoubtedly an idiot

I might further add that I have yet to see any decision-maker reference or suggest following Solomon’s lead based on evidence of wisdom Read the rest of this entry »

It’s almost cliché for politicians — and, for that matter, “The System,” by which I mean courts, lawyers, and professional cadre that orbit about — to voice desire for fewer divorces.

Now, though perhaps neither original nor exclusive, the thing that caught my eye in this IndyStar.com piece from last Friday is the need for strategic planning to make it manifest.

Here’s a key quote from “A plan for fewer divorces,” by Russ Pulliam.

[Robert Rector, of the Heritage Foundation] suggests a public policy initiative on behalf of marriage, similar to campaigns to reduce the school dropout rate. ‘Finishing school is difficult,’ he said. ‘It involves having a strong future orientation, delaying gratification, forgoing short-term income, and sticking to educational tasks that may seem unpleasant and boring.’

Marriage has similar requirements.

I agree.

At the same time, one has to Read the rest of this entry »

A successful marriage will require more time & attention than your job, hobbies or car. #marriagetip via RT @MarriageMentor

“Divorced men are 39% more likely to commit suicide than married men” http://t.co/AOmqZbfB « Whoa! via @divorcebusting RT @themarriagebed

“Divorce party” concept is misguided, ridiculous; sets unrealistic expectations for couples, families http://ow.ly/5oADx

Study: Women who have sex before age 16 more likely to divorce later in life; sparks important discussion http://ow.ly/5oAri

ThisIsOURShoutOut is a Christian ministry started 3 years ago by the son of divorcing parents http://ow.ly/5abb7 http://ow.ly/5abbs

Marriage viewed in a Godly perspective (as well as noting that divorce is not the panacea solution to marital problems) http://ow.ly/59HFa

« Older entries